About the Post

Author Information

A Fast Tracked Disaster: SB 305 Hidden Vehicle Compartments – Your Calls Needed Now

Printer Friendly Version

SB 305: Ohio's Hidden Vehicle Compartment Bill Could Make Felons out of Innocent Ohioans

As if the exotic animal ban wasn’t enough to show you how high the current administration and legislature can jerk their collective knees, they’ve outdone themselves with the latest bill that’s being fast-tracked to the governor: SB305, the Hidden Vehicle Compartment Bill.  The bill, sponsored by Senator Jim Hughes (R, Columbus – District 16) was initially summarized as follows:

Senator Jim Hughes

To prohibit designing, building, constructing, fabricating, modifying, or altering a vehicle to create or add a hidden compartment, knowing or having reasonable cause to believe the vehicle will be used to facilitate a crime, and to prohibit operating, possessing, or using a vehicle with a hidden compartment, knowing or having reasonable cause to believe that the vehicle has been or will be used to facilitate a crime.

Do you think that version was maybe just a tad open ended?  And oh … yeah … they just left out one teen weeny little detail in the summary.  If you are charged and found guilty of breaking this newly proposed law, guess what?  You get a new title: FELON.  But this couldn’t possibly affect you, right?  I mean, it’s not like you might own a gun, store it in your vehicle out of sight, and have one of those CHL permits which over a quarter million Ohioans now have.  Nah, this won’t affect you, you right-wing kook.

Well, thankfully, Buckeye Firearms Association (BFA) worked to have the poison for gun owners taken out of this bill .  As stated on their website, BFA worked with Governor Kasich’s office to fix the problems.  (By the way, we find it interesting that this bill appears to be driven from the top down.  Why?)

When we made Governor John Kasich’s office aware of our concerns, his staff reached out to us to help change the bill to protect firearm rights. Substitute SB305, scheduled and adopted by the Judiciary committee today, reflects many of the changes we requested. These changes specifically exempt containers that are manufactured and/or advertised to be used to secure valuables, electronics or firearms in vehicles. Simultaneously, the bill was also re-focused to require the state to prove that hidden compartments in vehicles are used with the intent to transport controlled substances.

Ok, now let’s just back up a bit and talk about just what is the purpose of this bill?  Why is it even being considered right now?  That’s the $64,000 question to which we haven’t yet found anyone with a solid answer.  The bill seems to be driven by the Ohio State Highway Patrol.  The best we’ve been able to learn is that they want to be able to charge someone who is trafficking drugs, but does not have the drugs on them at the time they are stopped.  I.e., they want to be able detect “residue” of the drugs (in the container) and they also want to use the bill as a way of preventing drug traffickers from coming to Ohio in the first place.  Of course, criminals always pay attention to state laws and they’ll of course check with their local authorities on hidden compartment laws before coming to Ohio. (Our tongue is now being removed from cheek.)  Are you frightened yet?  If not, think about this.  What if you purchased a used car, which was previously owned by a drug dealer and had a hidden compartment in it?  Or what if you kept some money in a hidden compartment in your car and that money had traces of drugs on it?  Are you frightened now?

Now back to the bill itself.  After BFA’s hard work on getting the improvements made we now have a bill summary as follows:

To prohibit designing, building, constructing, fabricating, modifying, or altering a vehicle to create or add a hidden compartment with the intent to facilitate the unlawful concealment or transportation of a controlled substance, prohibit operating, possessing, or using a vehicle with a hidden compartment with knowledge that the hidden compartment is used or intended to be used to facilitate the unlawful concealment or transportation of a controlled substance, and prohibit a person who has committed a first or second degree felony violation of aggravated trafficking in drugs from operating, possessing, or using a vehicle with a hidden compartment.

This is the summary of the version of the bill which passed out of the senate (with no floor debate) on May 3rd by a 30-2 margin with only senators Keith Faber (R, Celina – District 12) and Kris Jordan (R, Powell – District 19) opposing it.  That’s interesting since these two senators are (perhaps arguably) among the most liberty-minded in the Ohio senate.  What didn’t they like about the bill?

And that brings us to this week.  Ohioans for Concealed Carry  (OFCC) published a compelling video on Tuesday which demonstrates how currency obtained from common locations around Ohio such as a Wendy’s, ATMs, and the Statehouse Parking Garage ALL contained traces of drugs.  In the video (embedded below), they show how the drug residue from money can be transferred to the inside of a container.  Although this threat is not specific to gun owners, they demonstrate how the drug residue can be easily transferred to small safes or cases which contain guns or other valuables.

In OFCC’s blog posting documenting the house hearings for the bill, they highlight several concerns which were voiced by legislators to the Ohio State Highway Patrol, including:

  • How can you prevent innocent people from being charged?
  • Are you using existing law (ORC 2925.14) to charge people?
  • How does OSP determine intent?
  • Why do you need to insert a protection for commercially available compartments if intent is such a good shield?
  • If a hidden compartment is found, is that a guarantee of arrest?
Several committee members said that they did not want to lose their right to make or modify compartments, and other members expressed concern about innocent people being charged.  [Ohio State Highway Patrol's] Lt. McGinty repeatedly said that the OSP needs to prove intent before an arrest, a statement that has been deemed incorrect by OFCC attorneys.

These are all excellent questions which OFCC and the legislators have raised, which need answers and the legislature needs to SLOW DOWN NOW!   Additionally, Ryan Walters of the 1851 Center for Constitutional Law  stated after reviewing this bill that the Ohio legislature has a “noxious trend” of making violators of new laws into FELONS.  The penalty of becoming a felon that this new law carries has many implications, not the least of which includes losing your 2nd amendment rights and your voting rights.

ACTION NEEDED

UPDATE.  We learned early this morning that the bill has already passed out of committee and is likely headed to a floor vote TODAY.  Your calls are needed IMMEDIATELY to your Ohio House Reps.  Please ask them to vote NO on this bill.  To look up the contact information for your rep, follow this link: http://www.house.state.oh.us/index.php?option=com_displaymembers&Itemid=73

Tags: , , , ,

4 Responses to “A Fast Tracked Disaster: SB 305 Hidden Vehicle Compartments – Your Calls Needed Now”

  1. William #

    Although this may be intended to help the police catch drugs it has many unintended (hopefully unintended) problems It would give tthe government the power to arrest almost anyone they desire. It is just one more nail in the coffin of freedom.

    May 24, 2012 at 7:53 am Reply
  2. Carl #

    Agree with the original post. Unintended has many definitions. This proposed “law” will allow the OSP even more latitude to intimidate and coerce the common citizen.

    I moved to this state ten years ago. I have NEVER observed as many police officers in any other state as in Ohio. Apparently they pay their way by issuing traffic tickets as noted on their statics site. They also lose half of the citizen complaints cases which is an abysmally low number for a supposedly respected office.

    The proposed law will allow an officer to pull over, search, find what they want and then test your cash for a “trace” of illegal drugs which is proved to be ubiquitous across the money dispersed by banks nation wide. A cop doesn’t like you, you can become a felon with no proof of committing a crime if this “law” is adopted. Police state here we ARE.

    May 24, 2012 at 11:13 am Reply
  3. Ken #

    The title and introduction to this law is very misleading. When you read the actual proposed law, a “hidden container” does not have to be hidden at all, just to hide what is inside it.

    Here is the actual wording: “Hidden compartment” means a container, space, or 21 enclosure that conceals, hides, or otherwise prevents the
    discovery of the contents of the container, space, or enclosure. “Hidden compartment” includes, but is not limited to, any of the following:…”

    So a cardboard box sitting on the front seat becomes a “hidden container” by this law. Presumably, since a woman’s purse conceals what is inside it, it is a “hidden container”. Have money in your purse which contains “drug residue” (most U.S. currency does!), and she is committing a felony to have it sitting on the seat beside her.

    Put some of your cash in a locked box while you are traveling? That’s a felony.

    The OSHP has wants this bill so that they can arrest people they suspect have the intent to hide drugs in the future. OSHP has expressed it’s frustration that they cannot arrest people when they cannot find evidence of a crime. They want this law so that they can arrest someone for having an empty container that “they know” will be used in the future to hide drugs. How does a cop at the roadside determine someone’s “intent”? Arrest them and let them post bail, and hire an attorney to fight it out in court?

    Lock up your legal prescription for Vicodin while you are traveling? That will now be a felony.

    This is a terribly written law that will make felons of many law abiding citizens in Ohio. It needs to be stopped!

    May 24, 2012 at 1:31 pm Reply
  4. Mark Reising #

    Just an update on OFCC’s position, they are now not opposing the bill as proposed amendments have addressed their concerns with more protection for gun owners. The problem with single issue groups is they can be swayed once their issues are addressed. Some senators and representatives even stated the Buckeye Firearms and the NRA were in support of the bill once they dropped opposistion due to changes made at their request.

    No amount of polishing will make this piece of excrement shine.

    May 26, 2012 at 5:42 am Reply

Leave a Reply

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox

Join other followers: